The second in the series:
Most colleges wrestle with low study-abroad numbers. How do you convince students, and professors, that taking time away from the campus is both feasible and beneficial to a student’s academic career? The University of Minnesota has developed a method for success by working closely with departments to map out a realistic timetable, and appropriate international partners, for dozens of majors.
Learn how Minnesota did it, and get tips for your own college, by joining a live chat with Gayle Woodruff, director of curriculum and campus internationalization at the university, and Martha J. Johnson, director of the learning-abroad center there
Sign up for a reminder at:
http://chronicle.com/article/Live-Chat-Innovators-in/64820/
4/1/2010
The second live blog in the series will be available soon. They answered questions about integration and curriculum. A first time summer workshop on internationalization will be held on the UM campus. For info go to:
http://umabroad.umn.edu/educators/summerWorkshop.html
Friday, March 26, 2010
Thursday, March 25, 2010
AFT's Faculty and College Excellence (FACE) initiative
FACE AFT Campaign
http://www.aftface.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=41
AFT's Faculty and College Excellence (FACE) initiative is a national campaign to reverse the crisis in instructional staffing at our nation's colleges and universities. Through organizing, legislative advocacy and collective bargaining, FACE is designed to achieve two goals simultaneously:
Achieving full equity in compensation for contingent faculty members; and
Ensuring that 75 percent of undergraduate classes are taught by full-time tenure and tenure track faculty and that qualified contingent faculty have the opportunity to move into such positions as they become available.
The campaign goals are designed to be phased in over time to ensure that there is no job loss for contingent faculty currently working at a college or university. For more information about the FACE campaign, read our Call to Action.
http://www.aftface.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=41
AFT's Faculty and College Excellence (FACE) initiative is a national campaign to reverse the crisis in instructional staffing at our nation's colleges and universities. Through organizing, legislative advocacy and collective bargaining, FACE is designed to achieve two goals simultaneously:
Achieving full equity in compensation for contingent faculty members; and
Ensuring that 75 percent of undergraduate classes are taught by full-time tenure and tenure track faculty and that qualified contingent faculty have the opportunity to move into such positions as they become available.
The campaign goals are designed to be phased in over time to ensure that there is no job loss for contingent faculty currently working at a college or university. For more information about the FACE campaign, read our Call to Action.
Adjuncts Are Committed to Teaching, Despite Work Conditions, Survey Finds
March 22, 2010, 12:01 AM ET
AFT Releases National Survey of Part-time & Adjunct Faculty
Friday, 19 March 2010
http://www.aftface.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=665
The latest report from AFT Higher Education, American Academic: A National Survey of Part-time/Adjunct Faculty, has just been released. Conducted by Peter Hart Research Associates, this national survey of part-time/ adjunct faculty examines:
who part-time/adjunct faculty are;
the conditions under which they work; and,
how they view their work and the challenges they face on campus.
The survey demonstrates that part-time/adjunct faculty are a diverse group. And, while they are committed to their teaching and eager to serve students, most express concerns about working conditions.
"What is happening in our colleges and universities today is directly linked to our country's economic future" stated AFT President Randi Weingarten. "Adjunct and part-time faculty play such a critical role in educating our college students and we must work to ensure that they are fully supported."
The survey is a national sample of 500 part-time and adjunct faculty employed in two- and four-year public and private nonprofit higher education institutions.
Download the full report:
http://www.aftface.org/storage/face/documents/aa_parttime_survey.pdf
AFT Releases National Survey of Part-time & Adjunct Faculty
Friday, 19 March 2010
http://www.aftface.org/index.php?option=content&task=view&id=665
The latest report from AFT Higher Education, American Academic: A National Survey of Part-time/Adjunct Faculty, has just been released. Conducted by Peter Hart Research Associates, this national survey of part-time/ adjunct faculty examines:
who part-time/adjunct faculty are;
the conditions under which they work; and,
how they view their work and the challenges they face on campus.
The survey demonstrates that part-time/adjunct faculty are a diverse group. And, while they are committed to their teaching and eager to serve students, most express concerns about working conditions.
"What is happening in our colleges and universities today is directly linked to our country's economic future" stated AFT President Randi Weingarten. "Adjunct and part-time faculty play such a critical role in educating our college students and we must work to ensure that they are fully supported."
The survey is a national sample of 500 part-time and adjunct faculty employed in two- and four-year public and private nonprofit higher education institutions.
Download the full report:
http://www.aftface.org/storage/face/documents/aa_parttime_survey.pdf
U. of Akron Dismisses Adjunct Who Resigned Last Fall in a Policy Protest
March 23, 2010
By Jill Laster
http://chronicle.com/article/U-of-Akron-Dismisses-Adjunct/64797/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
An adjunct instructor at the University of Akron who vocally opposed a policy stating that new hires might need to submit DNA samples or fingerprints has lost his job.
The instructor, Matthew Williams, who is also an officer in a national organization that seeks better working conditions for adjuncts, was scheduled to begin teaching a seven-week continuing-education course on March 31, the second of two courses he signed an agreement to teach in January. But he said he was informed by the university's department of continuing education and work-force development last week that he was ineligible to teach.
According to the university, Mr. Williams violated the terms of his contract with the School of Communication last fall when he quit in protest of the policy.
The policy, which was later rewritten, originally stated that new employees could be asked to submit DNA samples or fingerprints for use in federal criminal-background checks. The Board of Trustees revised the policy in December, removing references to DNA testing and saying instead that law-enforcement agencies would determine what information they needed from new employees for background checks.
Short Notice
Barbara O'Malley, a university spokeswoman, said the university chose not to let Mr. Williams finish his contract because he gave one day's notice when he resigned in the fall, leaving the university to find an instructor to teach in his place.
The university's written rules say that resigning employees "should give notice early enough to avoid serious interruption to the university operation," usually four months.
Ms. O'Malley said once the university learned Mr. Williams had been hired by the continuing-education department to teach the two courses, one of which ended this month, it told the department he could not teach the next course.
"When an employee walks off a job at the University of Akron, they're probably going to have a hard time getting that job back," Ms. O'Malley said.
Mr. Williams said resigning four months in advance to protest a policy would be difficult, especially as an adjunct. He also said that some of his actions in recent weeks, in addition to his protest of the DNA policy, led the university to end his contract early.
During an open forum for faculty members in late February, Mr. Williams questioned Luis M. Proenza, the university's president, about pay for top administrators. Mr. Williams also wrote e-mail messages to several members of the Board of Trustees this month arguing for better treatment of adjunct faculty members.
Mr. Williams, who is a senior leader of an adjunct-advocacy group known as the New Faculty Majority, has also been openly recruiting part-time faculty members to join the group. He has also testified twice before a committee in the Ohio House of Representatives in favor of legislation that would change the state's collective-bargaining laws to allow part-time faculty to unionize.
"Make no mistake here," Mr. Williams said. "All I am doing is expressing my First Amendment right to free speech and my right to academic freedom under the university's rules."
Ms. O'Malley said that the university was not retaliating for Mr. Williams's comments or actions.
Mr. Williams said he will file an appeal with the university in the next few days but isn't optimistic about the outcome. He declined to comment on whether he would take any further action against the university if his appeal is denied.
By Jill Laster
http://chronicle.com/article/U-of-Akron-Dismisses-Adjunct/64797/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
An adjunct instructor at the University of Akron who vocally opposed a policy stating that new hires might need to submit DNA samples or fingerprints has lost his job.
The instructor, Matthew Williams, who is also an officer in a national organization that seeks better working conditions for adjuncts, was scheduled to begin teaching a seven-week continuing-education course on March 31, the second of two courses he signed an agreement to teach in January. But he said he was informed by the university's department of continuing education and work-force development last week that he was ineligible to teach.
According to the university, Mr. Williams violated the terms of his contract with the School of Communication last fall when he quit in protest of the policy.
The policy, which was later rewritten, originally stated that new employees could be asked to submit DNA samples or fingerprints for use in federal criminal-background checks. The Board of Trustees revised the policy in December, removing references to DNA testing and saying instead that law-enforcement agencies would determine what information they needed from new employees for background checks.
Short Notice
Barbara O'Malley, a university spokeswoman, said the university chose not to let Mr. Williams finish his contract because he gave one day's notice when he resigned in the fall, leaving the university to find an instructor to teach in his place.
The university's written rules say that resigning employees "should give notice early enough to avoid serious interruption to the university operation," usually four months.
Ms. O'Malley said once the university learned Mr. Williams had been hired by the continuing-education department to teach the two courses, one of which ended this month, it told the department he could not teach the next course.
"When an employee walks off a job at the University of Akron, they're probably going to have a hard time getting that job back," Ms. O'Malley said.
Mr. Williams said resigning four months in advance to protest a policy would be difficult, especially as an adjunct. He also said that some of his actions in recent weeks, in addition to his protest of the DNA policy, led the university to end his contract early.
During an open forum for faculty members in late February, Mr. Williams questioned Luis M. Proenza, the university's president, about pay for top administrators. Mr. Williams also wrote e-mail messages to several members of the Board of Trustees this month arguing for better treatment of adjunct faculty members.
Mr. Williams, who is a senior leader of an adjunct-advocacy group known as the New Faculty Majority, has also been openly recruiting part-time faculty members to join the group. He has also testified twice before a committee in the Ohio House of Representatives in favor of legislation that would change the state's collective-bargaining laws to allow part-time faculty to unionize.
"Make no mistake here," Mr. Williams said. "All I am doing is expressing my First Amendment right to free speech and my right to academic freedom under the university's rules."
Ms. O'Malley said that the university was not retaliating for Mr. Williams's comments or actions.
Mr. Williams said he will file an appeal with the university in the next few days but isn't optimistic about the outcome. He declined to comment on whether he would take any further action against the university if his appeal is denied.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)